Jan Sluijters. Detail of Children’s Bedroom, 1910. Oil on canvas. Gemeentemuseum Den Haag.

This event is part of “Conserving Active Matter: A Cultures of Conservation Research Project,” a collaboration between Bard Graduate Center, the Humboldt University (Berlin), and the Rijksmuseum (Amsterdam), generously supported by The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. This initiative aims to bring new developments in materials science and new ways of thinking about matter to create new ways of thinking about the future of conservation. The project is articulated through semester-themed explorations along four axes: Indigenous ontologies (spring 2018), history (fall 2018), materials science (spring 2019), and philosophy (fall 2019).

When one examines a painted surface, whether a New Kingdom Egyptian sarcophagus or a John Singer Sargent portrait, it appears as though the paint is dry, and is therefore no longer interacting with itself or its environment. Nothing could be further from the truth. Paint is constantly active, responding to its surroundings and reacting with (for example) the water, light, and oxygen in its local environment. This can result in fading, darkening, or any number of other visual and physical phenomena including chalking and spalling. Other works of cultural heritage are similarly restive, from medieval stained glasses to modern and contemporary works prepared from a diversity of alloys and plastics. Objects that appear stable (such as a bronze with a green patina) can be rapidly reduced to dust in the wrong environment. More than one type of museum object (such as ancient Egyptian faience and cellulose nitrate film) have been known to degrade via explosion, and in the latter example to also “infect” their neighboring objects through the production of volatile corrosive gases. While one can easily identify a “dirty dozen” of artists’ pigments that are among the most active (such as Vincent Van Gogh’s infamous geranium lake red), the constant innovations of artists, chemists, and materials scientists means that there is a ready supply of challenging new objects and systems for art conservators and cultural heritage scientists to study and preserve. The input of art historians, historians, anthropologists, and archaeologists in this type of object-oriented study is critical to understanding the interpretation challenges represented by these altered works. Join us for two days of discussion about object change, from the molecular to the catastrophic to the magnificent, and learn about the surprising afterlives of works of art that are made from continuously evolving materials.

March 28
Peter N. Miller
Bard Graduate Center

Jennifer L. Mass
Bard Graduate Center

Metamorphosis and the Modern
James Coddington
Institute of Fine Arts, New York University

Jessica Walthew
Cooper Hewitt Smithsonian Design Museum

Margo Delidow
Whryta Contemporary Art Conservation; Whitney Museum of American Art

Clara Rojas Sebesta
Whitney Museum of American Art
Chris McGlinchey
The Museum of Modern Art

Undead Objects: Preservation of the Source Code
Marc Sebastian WaltonNorthwestern University

Deena Engel
New York University

Catherine S. Mallinckrodt
Virginia Museum of Fine Arts
Ashley Duhrkoop
Virginia Museum of Fine Arts

Pepe Karmel
New York University
James Coddington
Institute of Fine Arts, New York University
March 29
Jennifer L. Mass
Bard Graduate Center
Welcome and Introduction

The Death of a Painting: Metal Soaps and Molecular Self Assembly
Francesca Casadio
The Art Institute of Chicago

Barbara Berrie
National Gallery of Art

Silvia Centeno
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Petria Noble

The Afterlife: Materials Research and Reanimating Objects
Matthew Collins
Natural History Museum of Denmark

Glenn Gates
The Walters Art Museum

Tim Wess
University of the Sunshine Coast

Marco Leona
The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Panel Discussion

This event is part of our Cultures of Conservation initiative, supported by The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.