“Ornament and Crime”: Decoration and Its Discourses from Late Antiquity to Today
In his infamous 1908 essay “Ornament and Crime,” the Austrian architect Adolf
Loos warned that although “the urge to decorate one’s face and anything else
within reach is the origin of the fine arts … the evolution of culture is
synonymous with the removal of ornamentation … The modern person who
tattoos himself is either a criminal or a degenerate.” As Loos suggests,
decoration lies at the heart of artistic expression, yet it has also been
demonized across centuries and geographies as sacrilegious, superficial,
frivolous, deceptive, seductive, feminine, childish, naïve, foreign, primitive,
invasive, subversive, irrational, uncontrollable, uncivilized,
anti-intellectual, and anti-modern. Why? This team-taught course investigates
global discourses on decoration from Late Antiquity to the present, including
ornament’s contrasting deployment in “East” and “West,” its function as a site
of cultural exchange, and its status as a marker of “self” and “other.” In the
first half of the course, we will examine the ornamental vocabularies of Late
Antiquity and the rise of the “arabesque,” the uses of ornament in the lands of
the caliphate, and how objects and motifs from the Islamic world were adapted
and redeployed in medieval and early modern Europe. The second half will
consider the problem of ornament in the modern West, from eighteenth-century
chinoiserie to nineteenth-century scientific and ethnographic approaches to
decoration through the modernist “criminalization” of ornament, arriving
finally at postmodern and contemporary interventions—and celebrations. Students
will be encouraged to draw connections between ornament and cultural meaning in
relation to their own experiences with and views on design. 3 credits. Depending
on your final research project, this course can satisfy the pre-1800 or the
non-Western distribution requirement.